Saturday, January 13, 2007

Molly's paradigm shift

Molly writes, in a post at Adventures of Mercy, about her move from a complementarian or patriarchal view of gender relationships to an egalitarian one. This has been a real and difficult change of outlook for her. In a comment on her own post she writes:
I cannot begin to tell you what it has been like for me…just like a death…but yet I have felt like the One stirring up the questions in my heart was not my own rebellion, but Jesus, and most of it coming straight from Scripture. I had been so trained to read Scripture from a patriarchal perspective that I was unable to see it any other way without Divine intervention. Well, it’s either Divine or I’m totally decieved, one or the other, which is something I pray for (for truth and not deception) daily!
Molly certainly has a good point here about "Divine intervention".

Very often patterns of thinking about the teaching of the Bible become very deeply ingrained, and to change them requires what is technically called a paradigm shift. Sometimes people are able to make such paradigm shifts when presented with overwhelming evidence, but this is rather rare. Even in science, which is supposed to be objective, it is rare for established scholars to shift their personal paradigms to accept a completely new theory; the paradigm shifts which have occurred have more commonly been spread over decades, as the older generation has been gradually replaced by new scholars accepting the new theory.

But with theological understanding there is also a spiritual element. I think most of us would accept this when we consider the personal paradigm shift required for someone to become a Christian. For those with no Christian background this is one of the greatest paradigm shifts that could be made. And it is one which people are rarely persuaded to make by overwhelming logical arguments, although more commonly perhaps they are prompted to shift by evidence they see for themselves of God's activity. But it is not without good reason that most Christians hold that this paradigm shift can only be made with the help of the Holy Spirit, whose work includes opening the unbeliever's heart to God's truth. As the apostle Paul wrote:
And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. 4 The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
(2 Corinthians 4:3-4, TNIV)
But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away.
(2 Corinthians 3:16, TNIV)
Now the paradigm shift which Molly made is small compared with that of becoming a Christian. Nevertheless, I'm sure she is right to attribute it to "Divine intervention". When "the god of this age" has lost complete control of someone to the true God, he tries every trick in the book to get back into their lives to deceive them and make them ineffective as Christians. Galatians 3:1 is surely a biblical example of this. I know that he has done this kind of thing in many ways in my own life; I am still struggling in some of these areas, and there may be others which I am not yet aware of.

It seems to me that one of Satan's current strategies to deceive Christians and make them ineffective is... well, I won't say complementarianism in general, but I will suggest that it is the strident complementarianism or patriarchalism which seems so strong in the USA at the moment, although not so much here in the UK except perhaps in circles connected with Adrian's (currently dormant) blog.

This kind of stridency seems to go hand in hand with a lack of concern for people and how they will react. In this case, an insistence on patriarchy is surely causing many, men as well as women, to turn away from the Christian faith, potentially to their eternal ruin. But mention this to a strident complementarian, and the response is likely to be that God's truth is more important than whether people are saved or not. Well, God's truth is important, but there is no Christian obligation to present it in an unattractive way. I'm not suggesting that complementarians conceal their beliefs, but is there a good reason why they don't stop being contentious about this issue and instead put their efforts into positive preaching about the great blessings in the Gospel?

In fact the not so good reason for this that I am discerning is that these people have fallen for Satan's deceitful schemes. Indeed this seems to be part of his worldwide strategy for stirring up trouble by encouraging intolerant and angry fundamentalism among followers of every religion, including atheism. In this strategy 9/11 was a major success, not so much for the original attack as for the over-reaction which followed, including the invasion of Iraq which has simply encouraged all kinds of fundamentalism. But I am straying too far from the subject of this post!

So, how can people be encouraged to abandon strident complementarianism, or fundamentalism of any kind? It seems to me that presenting rational arguments to such people, as I have been doing here, at Better Bibles Blog, on Adrian's blog etc, is about as effective as bashing my head against a brick wall. But maybe Molly's paradigm shift shows us a better way. If, as she testifies, it took "Divine intervention" to change her from a complementarian to an egalitarian, then we should, instead of trying to win people by arguments, be praying that God will intervene in their lives and show them his truth. And at the same time we should allow him to intervene in our lives as well and show to us his truth, which may not be exactly what we have been trying to promote with our arguments.

Meanwhile, concerning the complementarian vision of male leadership, Corrie wrote this in a later comment on this same Adventures of Mercy post:
Christ, Himself, turned the leadership paradigm on its head when he told leaders not to be like the heathen but to be like Him, someone who gets on His knees to serve and not someone who expects to be served.
But this aspect of the Christian paradigm is so often ignored by those who believe that leadership is male, especially by men who seem to expect women to be their servants. If these men aspire to being leaders in the home or in the church, they should take to heart Jesus' own words:
You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them. 43 Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, 44 and whoever wants to be first must be slave of all. 45 For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.
(Mark 10:42-45, TNIV)
Now it is surely another part of Satan's strategy to pervert God's originally designed concept of leadership into the kind of "lording it" which Jesus rejects here. Indeed this is a very ancient strategy which goes back at least to the time of Samuel (1 Samuel 8:11-18), and probably to the Fall. But this is an issue on which the Bible seems to be unanimous. So, rather than a head-on challenge on the basic complementarian position, it is perhaps a more productive strategy in countering strident complementarians to challenge them with this biblical view of leadership. Maybe men who realise that leadership in the family or in the church requires them to act as slaves, even to give up their lives, will no longer be so eager to claim this leadership for themselves and deny it to women!

6 Comments:

At Saturday, January 13, 2007 6:18:00 pm, Blogger Molly said...

Thanks for the link, Peter, and for the comments you left over at AinM.

I am finding that sometimes the best "proof" is that I am finding anti-patriarchal stuff from Scripture, not from outside theories. Also, that I'm not angry (though I am a little at the years I lost, I'll admit it, but that's more my fault than anyone else's, because *I* was the one who read and believed it all)...at first, I was so used to being the victim (so used to it not being my responsibility) that I wanted to lash out, to blame everybody and anybody...it was hard to see that the one to blame, if anybody, was ME. I was the one who agreed with the arguments, I was the one who bought the books, I was the one who promoted the concept.

I would agree that patriarchy crippled me. I was unable to hear what God said I was to be doing, because it didn't fit into the meek/hidden woman concept of the patriarchal mold I'd accepted. But I'm not sure if patriarchy cripples everybody. I think Love is the rule, and a patriarchal home that is covered in Love's rule probably looks much like an egalitarian home covered in Love's rule.

So the enemy, for me, isn't so much patriarchy (even though that's what I talk about a lot these days, since it interests me) but is how our eyes that cannot see with Christ's upside-down way of seeing the world.

Just as you were talking about authority, you know...I mean, that's a basic teaching of Christ, that in His view, authority is a great ability to serve...but...we miss it. We've missed it all through history, on a general scale and continue (generally speaking again) to miss it today.

I mean, I can see how someone can feel that the Bible supports patriarchy---the text read with a 21st century mind ignorant of the cultural practices during the time of the text would lead just about anyone to conclude that patriarchy is God's way, I think. But for us to totally miss that leadership, Jesus-style, is a radically different paradigm than the kind we see on earth? It's right there in front of us in the text, yet we can't see it.

Why is that? Is that part of what Paul was talking about in Eph. 1 and Eph. 3, where he prays that God would open our eyes so that we could see/comprehend?

Okay, enough rambling...this whole thing is just huge, I think, way beyond patriarchy. Patriarchy is, perhaps, just one small symptom of a much greater stumbling block.

Great thoughts--always enjoy reading them.

 
At Saturday, January 13, 2007 6:38:00 pm, Blogger Peter Kirk said...

Thanks, Molly. I'm not sure what else to say - except that I also liked your post on HOW the male ought to rule, and Psalmist's comments on that post as well as your own.

 
At Saturday, January 13, 2007 7:28:00 pm, Blogger Lydia said...

Divine Intervention--I like that. And yes, paradigm shifts can be extremely difficult, as well as sometimes painful. Christ's upside-down view of the world does leave us disoriented, off-balance, and extremely out of our element--and it takes time, prayer, companionship, reading, to re-orient. Loving the journey, Molly . . .

 
At Monday, January 15, 2007 6:03:00 pm, Blogger John Radcliffe said...

Amen, Peter

I suspect I'm not the only person who has visited the CBMW website and come away amazed and saddened: first, that such an organisation should exist, and then by how much effort and ingenuity is being put into men defending (what effectively amounts to) male leadership, when IMO that same effort could have been much more valuably directed elsewhere. (Some of the articles just seem to be "stretching" the concept to its "logical" conclusion to see where that takes them. I find it hard to imagine anyone coming to Christ because they read a good article on "eternal subordination". Perhaps this is another case of the enemy considering it far easier -- and much more effective -- to misdirect effort than stop it altogether?)

And what about the effort expended by the ESV translators? If only they had simply concentrated on seeking precision and clarity rather than apparently trying to follow an inconsistent and unsupportable theory about the existence of a "male meaning component" in certain Hebrew and Greek terms.

 
At Wednesday, January 17, 2007 4:00:00 pm, Blogger Theoblogian said...

Thanks for posting this, Peter. I checked out Molly's blog and it was right on...what a great and vulnerable thing to write. I really appreciated it. Both this post and hers, along with some other things i've been ruminating on, have inspired me to do a series on the language of Father and the way we're involved in gender discussions.
if you're interested, i'd love to hear your thoughts: feel free to comment here. Thanks again.
Mike Swalm

 
At Monday, January 22, 2007 6:32:00 am, Blogger Psalmist said...

Peter, I should have mentioned earlier that I really appreciate your kind reference to my comments at Molly's blog. I read your posts, mainly at Better Bibles, and truly enjoy them. I ought to say so more often. Thank you for the valuable way in which you build up the body of Jesus Christ.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home