The acceptable face of charismaticism?
In a post on his blog today, linking to sermons by one of his heroes, Adrian Warnock wrote:
C.J. Mahaney is well-known as the acceptable face of charismaticism.I commented in response:
If CJ "The Father killed the Son" Mahaney is "the acceptable face of charismaticism", then may God preserve the non-Christian world from its unacceptable face!Adrian deleted my comment, as he did not want to open up a new debate on this matter. In fact I had no intention of taking it any further, but maybe others would have tried to reopen the debate we had in June. (By the way, I don't want to reopen it with this post either.)
Well, I sympathise with Adrian to some extent. He recently had the comment thread on an excellent post on the charismatic debate hijacked by an irrelevant discussion about Benny Hinn. But in this case I was responding directly to a statement Adrian was making about Mahaney. It seems that Adrian is not willing for his statement to be questioned. He allowed all kinds of frankly libellous accusations to be made against Hinn (in fact he could probably get in legal trouble for publishing them), before eventually calling an end to that discussion. Could it be that he is so sensitive to a negative opinion about Mahaney because he doesn't personally agree with it?
Is censorship "the acceptable face of charismaticism"?